UNFAZED: FAIZ Khan, another Aiyaz Khaiyum appointee to the various Boards, has reportedly applied for new pay rise despite being paid nearly $300,000; on Human Rights Commission with Lautoka High Court judge

COMING LATER: Who was the man in the dimly lit room whom Frank Bainimarama had introduced to his top military officers before the 2006 coup? Why was he hiding his face from the officers? And why IMMUNITY has been ring-fenced in the 2013 Constitution of Fiji to protect
Parasites in Paradise?

* The Lautoka based lawyer Faiz Khan is reportedly paid around $300,000 from the Board and Chairman positions (other than Fijian Holdings appointment) he holds, all appointed by Aiyaz Khaiyum; this apart from income derived from his law firm Faiz Khan Lawyers;

* He has reportedly applied in writing for further pay raise to the Minister of Economy this November/December 2016;

* He is being paid more than Bainimarama and Khaiyum. Does he do more work than the two? Of course not, so the question arises, why does Khaiyum keeping approving pay raises?;

* Why can't Bainimarama direct Khaiyum to appoint a CEO for both Tropik Wood Industries Fiji Ltd and AFL?;

* How can one person (Faiz Khan) devote time to 3 full time jobs - running a law firm, AFL and Tropik?;

* Did Faiz Khan abuse his powers being on FRCA Board?

* Take, for example, the Fiji High Court judgement involving FRCA and General Machinery (GM); in that case the Judge commented and said that Faiz Khan should not get involved being in Board position.

* Faiz Khan is also accused of revealing the whistleblower's name to another company director?

* He is also accused of other questionable deals involving his family and others whom Khaiyum appointed to other Boards and Institutions, which we are holding back

* Faiz Khan is also on the Board of Human Rights Commission whose
Chairman (Amjeer Mohammed) is a Judge based in Lautoka High Court and hears cases from Faiz Khan Lawyers, both appointments done by  Khaiyum. This is a clear case of conflict of interest!

Judgment against Faiz Khan as FRCA Board Member: "It appears that Mr Khan, being himself a lawyer and a member on the board of FIRCA and FKTL [Feroz Khan Transport Limited], should have advised himself not to be involved even at that level that he did in the proceedings of this case. Mr Khan's involvement in the case, even at that level, was improper; and, such conduct was capable of giving a perception that he was involved in the proceedings of the case."

Read para., 3, 5, and 7
Admission by FRCA of Board involvement; there was a strong finding by the High Court judge against Faiz Khan:

<http://www.paclii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/fj/cases/FJHC/2011/799.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=General%20Machinery#disp0>*

<http://www.paclii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/fj/cases/FJHC/2011/799.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=General%20Machinery#disp2>