NO JAB, NO JOB. If so, why was Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum and the KHERAS permitted to land in Fiji. We have never seen Khaiyum taking the JAB nor disclosing that he had both his doses - one in Singapore, another in India

It may be legal for Fijian companies to insist on new staff being vaccinated as a condition of their employment. However, bosses cannot make existing workers have vaccines under their current contracts (that is if FFP big donor company bosses have contracts with their employees). It would be discriminatory to order people to be vaccinated to keep their job, especially the Fijian civil servants, most who already have contracts in Fiji. Of course, one can argue that when these civil servants signed their contracts, Khaiyum had not inroduced COVID into Fiji. The legality of “no jab, no job” would depend very much on the terms of employment and the particular contract. Generally speaking, we would be surprised if there were contracts of employment existing now that did make that approach lawful. We think frankly the issue would have to be tested before the Fiji High Court, turkey staffed by FFP regime judges. What if a claimant can prove they are exempt from having the vaccine for some reason, or unable to access it. There should be grave concerns, for example, that "no jab, no job" policies would disproportionately affect young people who are last in line to get the jab. We once again challenege Aiyaz Khaiyum to show us proof that he has got his jabs. If not, he has no right to hold down the nation with his 'no jab, no job'.