Quantcast
Channel: Fijileaks - Home
Viewing all 3541 articles
Browse latest View live

$22million Fiji Development Bank loan to INSULT native Fijians on FBC TV? Fiji Hindi speaking Nemani Bainivalu, the host of Wasea Bhasha, insults i-taukei on his program; in 2014 he had whacked a "KAILOMA"

$
0
0

* Indigenous Fijians are inferior because they fail in universities and they spend more time participating in sports - FBC's Nemani Bainivalu

Picture
REDUCED FROM HEROES TO ZEROS: Fiji's Olympics Gold winners with FFP Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama

* Indigenous Fijians are academically poor because they do not know how to read in English:

* The teachers are ineffective because they are mostly "grog dope":

From Fijileaks Archive

Ratu Isoa OUT of Parliament

Like the Fiji Times trio, Bainivalu can be accused of making antagonistic comments against the native Fijians, comments which non-native Fijian school children could employ to look down on native Fijian students as academically DUMB. And FBC CEO Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum could be charged alongside Bainivalu, despite Riyaz Khaiyum claiming that any suggestions of INCITEMENT are not correct!

From Fijileaks Archive, 31 January 2016:

Nemani Bainivalu's Official Apology in native Fijian (below):

Official Apology - English Version
Official Apology - Hindi Version

Fijileaks to Fiji Broadcasting Commission CEO Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum: "When is INCITEMENT not an INCITEMENT"? When it is YOUR FBC antagonizing hatred against indigenous Fijians:NO ONE IS ABOVE LAW?

$
0
0

The Fiji Times has been penalized once before under your brother's Media Decree for publishing a Letters to the Editor; and its bosses have been dragged before the court for publishing another - frankly speaking, we had not even seen the 'LETTER', and so must have many Fijians, but Wasea Bhasha has a wider reach and audience - for being a
State channel

Fijileaks to DPP: 'It is alleged that Nemani Bainivalu and Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum of Fiji Broadcasting Commission, made, or caused to be broadcast, statements in the iTaukei, Hindi, and  English languages that is likely to incite dislike, hatred, or antagonism of the
i-Taukei community'

* Indigenous Fijians are inferior because they fail in universities and they spend more time participating in sports

In booting Opposition Whip Ratu Isoa Tikoca out of Parliament, the FFP dominated Privileges Committee stated it was protecting Fiji's children from his (Ratu Isoa's) type of racial profiling and vilification of the Muslim community. But what about FBC's Nemani Bainivalu and
Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum?:
* Indigenous Fijians are academically poor because they do not know how to read in English

LOOKING BEYOND RACE AND CONFLICT: Fijileaks founding Editor-in-Chief VICTOR LAL and the President of Fiji Jioji Konrote in London

$
0
0
Picture
LOOKING BEYOND RACE AND CONFLICT: President Jioji Konrote and the First Lady Sarote with Victor Lal who was a personal guest of the President at a special farewell reception and dinner in London last week. The Fijileaks founding Editor-in-Chief Victor Lal presented the President and the First Lady a signed copy of his book. It turned out both are avid followers of Fijileaks

The Royal Encounters
2016: President Konrote and the First Lady meet the Queen at Buckingham Palace in London;
1982: Victor Lal and Her Majesty the Queen in Fiji

"Oh, so you beat me by 34 years", President Konrote joked with Victor Lal after meeting Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11 earlier in the afternoon before the dinner. Victor Lal (right photo) was then a young journalist on the original Fiji Sun in 1982. Behind Lal is his old journalist friend Dennis Rounds, then with the Fiji Broadcasting Commission
Picture
Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), Oxford University: Victor Lal spent many years holding various research fellowships at the International Development Centre at QEH, which had been granted a Royal Charter by the Queen. The former President Ratu Epeli Nailatikau is also its former alumni. He was at QEH's Oxford University Foreign Service Programme (FSP) which runs a set of courses and degree in diplomatic studies, for practising diplomats and other professionals
Dr Butler (now Sir David) was Victor Lal's academic supervisor at Oxford in the 1980s. In 1969 Butler, now 92 and retired but still a good friend and mentor to Lal, had advised Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara on the formation of the multi-racial Alliance Party, and on party politics and constitutions in multi-ethnic societies in the British colonies. Victor Lal's late father was president of Alliance Party's Tailevu North branch, and his late uncle was the Alliance Mayor of Suva in the 1970s; he also stood twice, and naturally, lost to NFP's Deputy Leader the late Mrs Irene Jai Narayan in the Suva Indian Communal seat in the 1972 and 1977 general elections. For his services to Suva and Fiji, a street was named in his memory: RAJ MOTI LAL STREET at Raiwai, Suva. Meanwhile, in 2011, Butler was knighted by the Queen for his services to the study of elections, monarchy and the constitution.
Picture
Professor Sir David Butler in the garden of Nuffield College, Oxford, 1992

HACKING UPDATE: Fijileaks is not in a position to divulge any information, for overseas investigations are still on-going. Fiji Police, however, are still not acting against the hackers - many closely aligned to the FFP government. Some in Fiji have already concluded that Victor Lal will never be allowed to return to the land of his birth. The following from an Indo-Fijian businessman to Victor Lal, August 2016:
"Anyway, whoever has rammed you must be smiling eh? Now listen, "GO FUCK YOURSELF"...you made some bad enemies. Oh hang on, let me have the last laugh..... Am going to cheer, laugh and dance with my Fiji Team while you sit and cry in your corner in London. Send some more emails to Govt and publish some more on your 3rd grade shit blog. Bravo to the hackers!! You are now naked as a 3 legged diseased bitch. Again, GO FUCK YOURSELF. Feel so sorry you will never get to breath[e] the pure Fiji air in your life again.....very unlucky aye you cyber terrorist?? Serves you right. By the way nice clip...lolol..... Sala gandu."

FFP: REGISTERING FijiFirst Party NAME was not Intellectual Property Theft. Now FFP government boasts of winning three trademark cases in China's IP courts to register FIJI PURE MAHOGANY, FIJI PURE and FPM

$
0
0

"As there are few cases relating to certification marks and GI's in China, judicial precedents and theory are still nascent, and no useful doctrine has been established. In the 2015 case summary published by the TRAB, only seven cases involve certification marks, including the three handled by King and Wood Mallesons. The court judgment in those three cases encompass some new ideas and practices that will provide guidance when applying to register certification marks."

Picture
By Yang Xiaoli (partner), Zhang Jiaqi (senior associate) and Kang Lifang (associate), King and Wood Mallesons

I. Case facts "FIJI PURE MAHOGANY" (No. 10437014), "FIJI PURE" (No. 10437015), and "FPM", as applicable to register three certification marks "On January 18, 2012, the government of the Republic of Fiji (the "Fijian Government " (No. 10437016) at the Trademark Office of China, all for "plantation grown mahogany timber" in Class 19.

(2) After examination, the Trademark Office refused registration of the three marks on the grounds that (1) the first two applied-for marks were devoid of distinctiveness; (2) the third mark was similar to the cited mark [PFM] (No. 6119374); and (3) the applicant, the Fijian Government, did not submit effective Rules for the Use of Certification Marks for all of the three applications. Dissatisfied with the decisions, the Fijian Government filed a review with the Trademark Review And Adjudication Board ( "TRAB"). Upon examination, the TRAB upheld the Trademark Office's decisions for the following reasons:
  1. The marks were devoid of the distinctiveness necessary for a trademark.
  2. The applicant did not submit any documents approving the geographic indications ( "GI") granted by the local government or competent authority of the region represented by the GI's.
  3. The Rules for the Use of Geographical Indications submitted by the applicant did not provide detailed information on the professional personnel and testing equipment of the agency appointed by the applicant. Nor did the applicant submit any titles issued by a competent industry authority at provincial level or above To demonstrate the applicant's supervisory ability.
  4. The applied-for mark "FPM" was similar to the cited mark "PFM" used on similar goods. The evidence presented by the applicant was insufficient to demonstrate that the applied-for mark had become distinctive through use cited by the cited mark and would not Be confused with the latter.
  5. The applicant did not submit effective Rules for the Use of Certification Marks.
Disagreeing with all the above decisions, the Fijian Government incorporated administrative lawsuits before the Beijing IP Court. The Court supported all of the Fijian Government's claims and canceled TRAB's decisions. TRAB appealed against the first instance judgment to the Beijing Higher People's Court ( "BHPC" ), which upheld the judgment.

II. Issues of focus and main points of the court judgments: (1)Can an ordinary trademark or service mark be cited against a certification mark application? According to the Beijing IP Court and BHPC, a certification mark indicates the origin, raw material, method of manufacture, quality or any other features of goods or services, instead of their producers or suppliers. Hence, in principle, an ordinary trademark or service Where may not be cited against a certification mark application, and vice versa. There are exceptions, however, depending on whether a purported certification mark is viewed by the relevant public as such. Even though a registration is sought as a certification mark, a trademark Or a service mark may be cited to prevent it being registered as a certification mark if the public tend to view the applied-for mark as an ordinary trademark or a service mark so that it can be confused with a trademark or a service mark.

This is the case for the "FPM" mark. Both the Beijing IP Court and BHPC considered that "FPM" was a certification mark, but also a coined word that did not contain any geographical names. Given that the plaintiff had no evidence of its Being recognized through use of the public in China as a certification mark than an ordinary trademark, use of the "FPM" mark on goods identical with or similar to other goods covered by another mark may cause confusion. In this case, therefore, a Trademark may be used as a cited mark against it.

In addition, the above-mentioned determination of similarity of goods broke through the limit of the Classification of Similar Goods and Services. Specifically, under the Classification of Similar Goods and Services, the two types of goods covered by the opposing marks belong to the same Group in Class 19. Nonetheless, both the Beijing IP Court and BHPC insisted that they were not similar because they were substantially different in terms of functionality, use, manufacturing sector, distribution channel and target consumers.

(2) Distinctiveness requirement for certification marksIn the "FIJI PURE MAHOGANY" case, both the Beijing IP Court and BHPC held that a certification mark certifies the origin, raw material, method of manufacture of goods or performance of services, quality, or any other features of the goods or services in To the end, a certification mark generally includes the common name of the goods or services, origin, quality or other features. Therefore, the distinctiveness requirement (which is used, but is not used to identify their manufacturers, producers or suppliers. For an ordinary mark to fulfill its function does not apply to a certification mark. As the plaintiff had clearly indicated that the mark was to be registered as a certification mark when filing the application, Article 11 of the 2001 Trademark Law is not applicable Whether the applied-for mark has distinctive features.

(3) Application of the basic requirement of administrative opennessIn the "FPM" case, TRAB rejected the application for registration of the mark on the grounds, among others, that the applicant did not submit effective Rules for the Use of Certification Marks. In this regard, both the Beijing IP Court and BHPC held That while the Rules for the Use of Certification Marks submitted by the applicant was not in compliance with the Measures for the Registration and Administration of Collective Marks and Certification Marks, this would not necessarily lead to the rejection of a certification mark application. It was different from an ordinary trademark application that would be rejected if it "lacked distinctive features" or might "cause adverse effects". According to the administrative openness requirement, when examining a trademark registration, the trademark authority must give the applicant detailed reasons for Any non-compliance, and allow the applicant to make revisions and corrections so as to protect its interests. In this case, however, TRAB did not indicate which rule (s) submitted by the Fijian Government was non-compliant for the use of certification Marks and any reasons either in the examination process or its decision. This led to the applicant's failing to revise or improve its rules in later procedures and went against the basic requirement of administrative openness.

(4) About the applicant's ability to oversee the particular quality of the goods covered by the certification markIn the "FIJI PURE" and "FIJI PURE MAHOGANY" cases, the TRAB rejected registration of the two marks on the ground that the applicant did not submit detailed information on the professional personnel and testing equipment of an appointed agency in the Rules for the Use Of Geographical Indications, nor did it submit any documents from a competent industry authority at provincial level or above to demonstrate that the applicant was able to oversee the special quality of the goods covered by the certification mark. Both the Beijing IP Court and BHPC held that TRAB's rejection of the applications for registering GI's as certification marks was without any factual or legal foundation for the following reasons:

First, information about the professional personnel and testing equipment is to show the applicant's ability to oversee the particular quality of the goods covered by the certification mark, but not the ability to ensure that the goods satisfy any national or industry standards. Moreover, the defendant Therefore, professional personnel and testing equipment were just formal requirements for applying for a certification mark. The quality standards of the goods were not in a position to conduct any specific examination of the specific standards that the professional personnel and testing equipment were expected to meet. To which a certification mark applies should be determined in the market by consumers.

Second, professional personnel and testing equipment must relate to the special quality of the goods covered by a certification mark. The particular nature of the goods covered by a GI as a certification mark is determined by the natural conditions, or the natural and human factors of The quality of goods being determined by differentiating require different professional personnel and testing equipment, thus should be treated differently. As the marks at issue were certification marks that Contained the geographical name "FIJI" for plantation grown mahogany timber, the particular quality of the goods covered by the said certification marks was mainly determined by the natural conditions of the place of origin. Unfortunately, the TRAB's decisions did not take this point into consideration.

Third, the documents furnished by the Fijian Government were sufficiently to demonstrate that the Fijian Government was able to control the unique quality of the goods covered by the certification marks.

III. Lessons learned from the cases and their ground-breaking significanceWe represented the Government of the Republic of Fiji, in the first and second instance trials of the three cases, all of which introduced many complex new issues. Certification mark applications are relatively rare, and those which are eventually brought to the courtroom are even rarer , Resulting in few precedents to follow, especially where the plaintiff is a national government. The whole process from preparing the initial litigation documents to deal with substantive issues in the final phase involving intensive research and discussion of key issues. These included:

1. as the plaintiff was a national government, the first issues were verification of the signatory's authority and proof of the existence of a government, especially as the Beijing IP Court was exacting with the filed documents. Rounds of discussions led to the realization that the Constitution of a country generally contains provisions on the establishment of a government and the duties of the head of government (the prime minister in these cases). A reading of the Fijian constitution confirmed this point. Finally a notarized copy of the Constitution of the Republic Of Fiji was submitted and accepted as proof of the establishment and valid existence of the Fijian Government and of the authorized representative's identity.

2. The Measures for the Registration and Administration of Collective Trademarks and Certification Marks do cover the materials required to apply for a certification mark or a geographical indication, but much still unclear in practice, especially when a foreign entity applies for a certification mark. , The Trademark Office and TRAB are silent about what documents are needed. Sometimes (as in this case) an application may be turned down in the final stage even after the applicant has already consulted with the Trademark Office and TRAB about the documents required and has We can not accept the applicant of any missing documents and how to make up for them. We also argued that the TRAB, following the principle of administrative openness, should have notified the applicant of any missing documents and how to make up for them. Advised the client to provide all the materials for a certification mark application as set forth in the Measures for the Registration and Administration of Collective Trademarks and Certification Marks, and gave detailed advice on evidencing them. The client managed to collect key evidence for the case. The courts accepted it and overturned the TRAB's decisions.

3. As to whether a certification mark must satisfy the distinctiveness requirement, we contended that a certification mark was used to certify the origin, raw material, method of manufacture, quality or any other features of the goods or services, Different producers or suppliers. Therefore, the distinctiveness required of an ordinary trademark did not apply to a certification mark. The courts were accepted this argument.

4. In the FPM case, although the goods covered by the applied-for mark and those covered by the cited mark belonged to the same group under the Classification of Similar Goods and Services, we persuaded the courts that they were not similar because of their differences between functionality, use, distribution channel, and manufacturing sector. The courts often find similar between two types of goods belong to different classes, but rarely do they deny similarity when goods or services are in the same subclass.

As there are few cases relating to certification marks and GI's in China, judicial precedents and theory are still nascent, and no useful doctrine has been established. In the 2015 case summary published by the TRAB, only seven cases involve certification marks, including the three handled by King and Wood Mallesons.

The court judgment in those three cases encompass some new ideas and practices that will provide guidance when applying to register certification marks.



http://www.fijileaks.com/home/gazette-proof-aiyaz-khaiyum-and-frank-bainimarama-stole-the-party-name-fiji-first-party-from-anit-singh-and-others

http://www.fijileaks.com/home/powering-into-the-name-fiji-pensioners-reveal-more-on-true-ownership-of-fiji-first-party-stolen-by-bainimarama-and-his-clique

http://www.fijileaks.com/home/listen-to-real-fiji-first-party-leader-anit-singhs-interview-as-he-explains-how-they-were-cheated-of-the-name-by-khaiyumbanimarama

Why babies all over the world are now sleeping in boxes? Fijileaks has been asked to propagate this idea for Fiji - Burns Philp used it in 1970!

$
0
0
Picture
The Barakat Bundle includes clean birth kits, a mosquito net and a baby blanket
PictureA health centre in Phoenix, USA, launched a baby box project earlier this year
Nearly three years ago, the [BBC] Magazine reported on the Finnish baby box - a starter kit of clothes, sheets and toys the state gives to expectant mothers. The story went viral and was read by 10 million people in 18 months. Now the box idea itself is spreading around the world.

It's a tradition that dates back to the 1930s. Every new mother, regardless of background or income, gets a baby box from the government. The box contains a stash of supplies - bibs, bodysuits, nappies, a sleeping bag, outdoor gear, bathing products - as well as a small mattress. Putting the mattress in the bottom of the box creates the baby's first bed.

It has been credited with helping Finland achieve one of the world's lowest infant mortality rates.
Read more: Why Finnish babies sleep in cardboard boxes

More publicity for the idea quickly followed when the Finnish government gave a baby box to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, who were then expecting their first child. Soon afterwards, three fathers in Finland set up a business to supply boxes to customers all over the world. Two women in the US did the same thing. There is now a similar business in the UK, and there may be others elsewhere.

It was such a simple idea, and apparently so effective, that health professionals and social entrepreneurs also wanted to put the box to the test, in some cases teaming up with one of these private suppliers.

Often the contents of the box or the way it is distributed are designed to address local problems, from preventing infection to getting the baby out of the parents' bed, where there may be a risk of suffocation. And in some cases one of the key goals is - as it was in Finland in the early days - to encourage expectant mothers to attend antenatal clinics.

Two South African entrepreneurs, Ernst Hertzog of Action Hero Ventures and marketing executive Frans de Villiers, concluded that a plastic box, that can be used as a bath rather than a bed, was more useful for South African mothers. But the main objective was to get mothers to antenatal classes, and a trial carried out by the Research on Socio-economic Policy Health Group at Stellenbosch University last year concluded that the Thula Baba Box, as it is known, encourages mothers to attend clinics at an earlier stage of pregnancy, and to attend more frequently. Among other things, this reduces the risk of an HIV-positive mother dying in childbirth, and reduces the risk of HIV being passed from the mother to the baby.

De Villiers and Hertzog are keen for the project to be rolled out across the Western Cape region, and hope that it may one day become a national programme. "We thought the Finnish box was an amazing example of design that changed a nation,'' says Hertzog. ''We hope that, given some tweaks, our product will have just as much of an impact.''
 
A doctoral student at Harvard University, Karima Ladhani, had a similar idea about adapting the Finnish box for use in South Asia. She developed the Barakat Bundle project (Barakat means "blessing" in some regional languages) which has now swung into operation at a rural hospital in Jagadiya, India.

The box includes a clean-birth kit to prevent infection during or soon after delivery and a mosquito net to protect babies against malaria.

"We wanted to provide low-cost life saving solutions to new mothers - specifically targeted to causes of preventable infant and maternal mortality," says Ladhani,

But it's not just in developing countries where infant mortality is a concern.
A pilot baby box project is being launched this month at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital in London, in collaboration with the US company, Baby Box Co, which says the education component of its programmes is "crucial" to their success.

"We take it for granted people have money for a separate sleeping cot or Moses basket but that might not be the case," says Karen Joash, the consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist behind the plan.

She also thinks the box will enable mothers to keep the baby in the same room with them, because it is so easy to carry, "which is good for bonding," she says.

There are dozens of projects under way in US states, but the biggest will launch later this year in Fort Worth, Texas, when all four of the city's hospitals start handing out baby boxes in an attempt to bring down the high infant mortality rate of 7.1 per 1,000 births in 2013. This compared to 5.9 per 1,000 births in the US as a whole.
About 36,000 boxes are expected to be handed out over the next two years. Here a key objective is to encourage parents not to sleep alongside their babies, in the same bed.

"We realised the community wasn't aware infant mortality was a big problem here," says Dyann Daley, of Cook Children's Hospital System.

"Our goal is to provide a box for every live birth in the city and give babies a safe sleeping environment because that is critical to preventing suffocation deaths."
 
A health centre in Phoenix launched a baby box project earlier this year.

A baby box project is also about to get under way in Australia, in the state of Victoria, and the province of Alberta in Canada has been running a pilot project since October 2015.

Karen Benzies, a professor of nursing at the University of Calgary, says the original intention was to target vulnerable families, but they soon realised "the idea of vulnerability that most people have around low income doesn't necessarily hold true in Alberta". It's a province that has done well out of the oil and gas industry, but when men stay away working on oil rigs for weeks at a time, that creates a different kind of problem - as new mothers are left alone with a new baby.

"Our goal is to support first-time families transitioning from pregnancy to parenting," says Benzies.

A key element of this is mentoring. Every mother and father has to identify a mentor who agrees to be in contact - via phone or in person - about 20 times from when the mother is 32 weeks pregnant to six months after the birth.

"We find in Canada that family and friends see a problem, but don't want to, or are told not to, interfere," says Benzies. "And we wanted to change that." So far about 50 boxes have been distributed, with 1,500 more ready to go.

Another innovation in the Canadian boxes is a "crib-side assistance" booklet for fathers, to encourage them to bond with the child. Modelled on a car-repair manual it provides a do-it-yourself guide to burping ("You know how good it feels to burp sometimes?") underlines the importance of "fuel" (mother's milk) and explains how to "look under the hood" for those inevitable nappy problems, because "keeping your new model clean and comfortable is important".

The Finnish government says it is aware of the global interest in their baby boxes and often provides consultation to other countries. It now gives presentations at embassies around the world.

But not everyone is convinced the box is the best way forward.

Colin Pritchard, a professor at Bournemouth University who has studied child and infant mortality, says the box system makes some "theoretical sense", as it provides the baby with somewhere to sleep other than the parents' bed and could therefore reduce the number of deaths linked to suffocation.
But he believes the effect will be marginal. Alleviating poverty, stopping parents smoking, and improving education and antenatal care - all these things are more fundamental, he argues, in tackling the problem of infant mortality. Source: BBC Magazine

Picture
The Alberta box in Canada includes nappies, a thermometer, a teething toy and shampoo
Picture
Thula Baba Box , South Africa

FANCY A FLIGHT OUT OF FIJI FRANK? Chinese whispers claim Frank Bainimarama and Aiyaz Khaiyum cut a deal for Bainimarama to travel out of Fiji as Foreign Minister so Khaiyum could bask in glory as acting PM!

$
0
0

MONEY MILKING FOREIGN TRIPS: The maths behind Bainimarama also becoming Foreign Minister is that his allowance can total $3000. The minimum wage is $2.32. If someone worked 8 hours a day, it would take them 161 days to earn what Bainimarama is now earning in allowances in
a single night:

And Bainimarama Junior is not far behind...he allegedly keeps demanding money, claiming it is for 'personal needs':

Picture
We have drastically redacted the document

PAYGATE SCAM: Coming soon - how Khaiyum had handed his aunty to pay salaries of interim Cabinet Ministers, running into millions without any transparency and accountability until he held and "won" the election

NO PARTY TIME FOR CHAUDHRY: The National Farmers Union again embroiled in money matters over Ba Festival; FLP leader and the NFU general secretary Mahendra Chaudhry yet to account for "old donations"

$
0
0

Fijileaks: We are no longer surprised with the behaviour of those who have their hands in the "till" - whether it is public money or raised through other means - taralalas, donations, festivals, fund-raisings: the list is very, very, very, long! Now, questions (and eye-brows) are being raised that some money from Ba Festival will go towards the running of the National Farmers Union. It reminds us of the famous Welsh singer Tom Jones song: "What's New Pussycat?" The answer, NOTHING. We are also acutely aware that a series of investigative revelations by VICTOR LAL in the Fiji Sun over FLP leader's finances and that of NFU, had not only led, in 2008, to the abduction, detention, torture and deportation of RUSSELL HUNTER, the then Publisher and Editor of Fiji Sun but HACKING had been introduced as a new tool to hide the stench of financial corruption in Fiji, and still continuing.

The recent HACKING of Fijileaks and Victor Lal's e-mails has the seeds in 2008, when those under scrutiny felt the urgent need to hack into Hunter and Lal's e-mail accounts to STOP THE INVESTIGATIONS. The then Bainimarama-Khaiyum-Chaudhry trio running the illegal post 2006 coup regime were heavily implicated in the HACKING but no one was brought to JUSTICE: "I have some juicy tips which may help the (FLP) Fiji Labour Party as a whole, especially things that Victor Lal is publishing. It is like early edition and you get info for tomorrow's paper today so you can act on it. Maybe I should send it to u or you can pass me Mahen’s email address" - Someone calling himself "fijimanfiji@gmail.com" to Chaudhry lackey Nikhil Singh, a former TV journalist.

These were PRIVATE e-mail exchanges between Hunter and Lal regarding Mahendra Chaudhry's tax files; the rest, as we say, is history. HACKING HAD NOW BECOME THE TOOL TO SUPPRESS TRUTH ABOUT STENCH OF CORRUPTION IN POST 2006 COUP FIJI. "fijimanfiji" was Fiji Sun's own in-house IT expert. The "snitch" was close to the then illegal Attorney-General and Justice Minister Khaiyum
http://mailman.aut.ac.nz/pipermail/pacific_media_watch_list/2008/000155.html.

NIKHIL SINGH: The man who had widely circulated the hacked e-mails between Russell Hunter and Victor Lal to local and international media within seconds after the plane, carrying deported Fiji Sun publisher Hunter, had taken off from Nadi airport in February 2008


From: Nikhil Singh <nikhil.singh@alliance.org.au>
Date: Feb 26, 2008 11:52 AM
Subject: Want to expose the truth?
To: newsroom@fijisun.com.fj,
timesnews@fijitimes.com.fj, newsroom@fijidailypost.com

Russell and his mate Victor Lal had a "strategy"…………..
All about media freedom? If you need more evidence drop me an email.

Singh had also posted some of them on Fiji Times Forum in 2008:

Nikhil Singh of Australia says…
—– Original Message —–
From: Victor Lal
To: Russell Hunter
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:10 PM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Datt Piece – Use This One. Amazing! It could be a fishing exercise – we had planned the story for Monday – unless Leone said something – maybe not. What blogsite – so they are reading about themselves? There is fear and panic in their camp – who is going to be next? I have looked at some regular sites but couldnt find anything. We must not be deterred from our strategy – I will try and rush through the Coventry piece, maybe for Monday or Tuesday followed by Scott piece. Yes, you can delete the stuff for I have all the copies including hard evidence


Nikhil Singh of Australia says…
russellh@fijisun.com.fj> wrote:

Sorry too late. When the sevens team bombed out, Sami decided to bring
it forward. It’s page 1 tomorrow.

Here’s something more interesting. AD called me on my mobile about two hours ago saying daaku junior had seen on a blog that there was a story about him (AD) in tomorrow’s Sun. I told him there was a story on FIRCA that did not mention him. Are you aware of any such blog? I could find nothing. To be safe I’m going to permanently delete everything on DT etc in case the boot boys come here in the morning armed with a search warrant – or worse.

 
AD is Arvind Datt – FIRCA Board Member
Daaku Junior: Nickname for Rajendra Chaudhry for story purposes:

Victor Lal’s story on Arvind Datt was published in the Sunday Sun on 3 February 2008: FIRCA Official in Tax Scam

On 02/02/2008, Victor Lal wrote:

I will work on her affidavit which is 27 pages long - she had sent it to me while I was in Norway with an attachment from FT titled "Justice Shameem is wrong, Fatiaki says. She said her conscience was clear - surprisingly, I was reading DT's report on Fatiaki and he cites this article - where she says F lied he was on holiday so couldnt be interviewed, when the article said he made the affidavit on 13 Dec.

I have asked DT if she was involved in anyway with the investigation. I take it the Datt piece didnt come out today - I thought we should have the following plan - Datt piece, followed by Coventry piece (to indirectly warn that there are also leakers in the judiciary etc) followed by Scott piece (see attachment) - I have very cleverly not included his exchanges with DT and claims of threat, which could follow immediately - I will try and write it on Sunday - than I will work on Fatiaki Tribunal and Justice Elliot and the 1975 crisis and bang, the A-G angle and interference.

While awaiting more on daaku - that way we will be one step ahead - Justices Jitoko and Jiten (who no longer have tea with the other judges) are already with me, and now Gates, Naz and Bryne have sunk further into the trap by their own leaks - just a random thought

Fijileaks: The e-mail exchanges between Russell Hunter and Victor Lal had made the lead six o'clock news on Fiji TV, who blatantly distorted the context, and claimed that Victor Lal was planning a revolution within the judiciary. The Fiji Human Rights Commission, in a separate report on Hunter's expulsion, called for Lal's arrest, if and when, he landed in Fiji.

To this day, VICTOR LAL has refused to publicly disclose or explain the context in which those comments on the judges was made. Sadly, through his thirty plus years of exposing corruption etc, he has seen many of his contacts and 'comrades' go on to join different coupist regimes, advancing their careers and filling their wallets, sacrificing their principles; many actually no longer keep in touch: shame or guilt? A few who had joined forces in 2008 to hunt for Mahendra Chaudhry's two million dollars themselves succumbed to greed, power, and corruption.

From Fiji Sun, reproduced in Fijileaks:

http://www.fijileaks.com/home/frank-bainimarama-and-his-pms-winston-fund-will-be-revealed-one-day-flp-and-nfu-leader-mahendra-chaudhry-behaved-the-same-telling-us-that-he-was-not-obliged-to-account-for-the-2003-cyclone-ami-funds

Fiji's two Walter Mitty law enforcers, Aiyaz Khaiyum and his side-kick Christopher Pryde, the then Solicitor-General, demanded Hunter publish Khaiyum's response to one of Victor Lal's opinion piece which had compared the different treatments meted out to Chaudhry and the then Chief Justice Daniel Fatiaki. Basically, Khaiyum and Pryde defended Chaudhry, who was the then interim Finance Minister in 2008, over the $2million he was hiding in his Australian bank account:

What follows is a response by the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Electoral Reform, Public Enterprises and Anti-Corruption on the Article by Victor Lal in the Sun dated 11.2.08 entitled “Where is the Justice?”
 
"where is the Justice?"
Or rather    "where are the facts?
 
Your article of 11 February 2008 by Victor Lal is meaningless, being based on a complete misapprehension of the role of the Tribunal appointed by the President to investigate the affairs of Chief Justice Fatiaki. The Tribunal has not been appointed to "prosecute "the Judge for tax evasion; it has been appointed to investigate alleged wrongdoings on his part (including tax irregularities) with an end to determine whether such wrongdoings might warrant his removal from office. Taxation malfeasance is but one part of the allegations and the issue to be resolved is whether such conduct is befitting of a person of the Chief Justice's position in society.  Mr Lal's constant references to "the Report" , which he links to the Fatiaki investigation is both misleading and dishonest journalism. He claims his authorities to be (mysterious)"sources" and bases his "facts" on premises such as "it was hinted that.."
 
Mr Justice Fatiaki is not being "charged with willfully with intent to evade tax"(sic) (whatever Mr Lal means by that) and his position is therefore patently different to that of "an interim Cabinet Minister". To suggest otherwise and to use the Chief Justice as an example to push for proceedings against "the Minister" not only confuses the issues involved but lends credence to Mr Lal's own (perhaps unwise) claim that he is "politically motivated".
 
The timing of Mr Lal's article also raises a rather worrying issue. The Chief Justice's affairs are about to be aired before the Tribunal this coming Wednesday and to write in detail giving opinions on the issues borders on contempt of Court.

12 February 2008

Christopher Pryde
Solicitor-General

Dear Mr Pryde

I would be extremely grateful if you could issue a public retraction to me on behalf of the Attorney-General Mr Khaiyum for patently and falsely attributing to me comments,  which I had not written in the Fiji Sun article.

At no point did I admit or confess that "I was politically motivated" against the interim Cabinet Minister who stands accused of tax evasion.

Thanks
Victor Lal

RO KEPA: 'I call on the CEO of FBC [Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum] to take responsibility and resign from his position and allow full and unimpeded investigation and all officials associated with program taken to account.'

$
0
0
Picture
STATEMENT 68
October 26th 2016


FIJI BROADCASTING COMMISSION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND BOARD MEMBERS MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR BREACHING SECTIONS 17 & 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION

The Minister for Justice and Attorney General, the Chairman of MIDA and the Police must immediately and jointly act, and bring to account, Riyaz Saiyad Khaiyum as the CEO of the entity and the Chairman and Board of FBC, responsible for this disgraceful and deliberate display of arrogance and hate.

Sec 17 (2) of the 2013 Constitution clearly states that there is no protection from (a) Propaganda for war; (b) incitement to violence or insurrection against this constitution; or (c) advocacy of hatred that (i) is based on any prohibited ground of discrimination listed or prescribed under section 26 and (ii) constitutes incitement to cause harm.

Sec 26 Right to equality and freedom from discrimination, states in (1) Every person is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection, treatment and benefit of the law. (3) A person must not be unfairly discriminated against directly or indirectly on the grounds of his or her

(a) Actual or supposed personal characteristics, or circumstances, including race, culture, ethnic or social origins, colour, place of origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, birth, primary language, economic or social or health status, disability, age, religion, conscience, marital status or pregnancy or
(b) Opinions or beliefs, except to the extent that those opinions or beliefs involve harm to others or the diminution of the rights or freedoms of others.

The outrageous allegations against our indigenous people by FBC suggesting we are inferior because we spend too much time on sports, and are academically poor performers because we cannot read English and teachers are too drunk on yaqona.

This is in clear breach of Sec 26 and in particular the provisions I have outlined. Under the circumstances, Nemani Bainivalu’s official apology is of no consequence.

Three indigenous members of Parliament were expelled and TheFijiTimes Editor and its Executives charged for far less racist or inciteful comments than the FBC sponsored direct attack on our indigenous people’s race, culture, status and other values protected under Sec 26.

I call on the CEO of FBC to take responsibility and resign from his position and allow a full and unimpeded investigation to be carried out and all the officials associated with the program taken to account.

Authorised by Hon. Ro Teimumu Vuikaba Kepa
Leader of Opposition




JUMPING TO DAD's DEFENCE! Whenever one tries to hold Chaudhry to account, FLP unleashes its hound dogs: 'Boring Victor. Latest regime sympathiser Victor Lal flogging a dead horse...over the old NFU funds' 

$
0
0

And yet Rajendra Chaudhry never stops, using Fijileaks published documents, to remind his followers: "Remember the CRW soldiers murdered by Bainimarama. He has been running from the law for 16 years but we will get him and that is a promise."

Fijileaks: Victor Lal is not "a latest regime sympathiser" 

REPETITIVE STANCE:
Here is what an NFU insider had told Victor Lal in April 2008: 'Anyway keep up the pressure.  An old man at a rural grog session I had recently with some people said to me to maintain a relentless assault [about NFU funds] and not be concerned if you appear to be repetitive. That's the way he [Mahendra Chaudhry] himself used to do it.'

By Victor Lal
August 2007
The Fiji Sun


And it was to this bank account that many of us from around the world wholeheartedly responded, in the hope that the money would reach the victims. I had first raised the whereabouts of the Cyclone Ami funds in August 2006, and had sent Mr Chaudhry  a list of questions, to which he is yet to reply.

The ICFI sent to me a detailed account of how much they had collected and distributed to the Cyclone Ami victims. The Congress had provided $300 cash each to ninety-four families to rebuild their homes and provided food parcels to 250 families immediately after the cyclone, it said.

Six members of the Governing Council of ICFI visited Fiji at their own expense and provided assistance. It must be stressed that ICFI’s contribution was independent of Mr Chaudhry and his NFU. GOPIO also confirmed sending its contributions to account number CA 155728.

A perusal of the bank statements relating to CA 155728 anonymously sent to me reveal that a total of $258,287 was deposited into the above account, and $237,196 withdrawn. The question that can be asked of Mr Chaudhry and the NFU, on behalf of the Cyclone Ami victims, is as follows: what was done with $237,196?

In 2003, there was also a deposit of $17,160, and a simultaneous withdrawal of $5,383. Again, if the money was intended for the Cyclone Ami victims why, it could be questioned, the whole sum was not distributed to them? Why was $12,000 not given out to the cyclone victims?

Similarly, for 2003 and 2004, there was a combined deposit of $85,860 and withdrawal of $60,880. Where did this sum end up, it could be asked? If one were to exclude the $5,383 withdrawn in 2003, where did $55,000 end up in 2004 from the account?

Also, has the Cyclone Ami account ever been audited or presented to a general meeting of the NFU? There seems to be no list of beneficiaries who benefited from the collections ever published to any NFU general meeting.

The widely variant sums withdrawn, according to the bank statements, suggest the absence of any method or criteria for distribution to Cyclone Ami victims, if any, at all. The statements also disclose foreign transactions. There are other large cash deposits and withdrawals, raising questions whether some of the sums had been used for other unrelated purposes.

The obvious question is with the Cyclone Ami victims largely rehabilitated shortly after 2003, then why this account no CA 155728 was not wound up?  Why is the money still sitting in the bank? What were the money coming in and the payments being made for three to four years after Cyclone Ami in 2003?

The large and regular withdrawals from mid-2005 to mid 2006 seems to coincide during the 2006 general election? What were the monies used for during this period?

According to reliable bank sources, Mr Chaudhry is allegedly the sole signatory to the Cyclone Ami funds.
The above figures exclude all the donations given to the FLP cause in person by dozens of party well-wishers in Australia, NZ, Canada, US and the UK

After his release from captivity following the 2000 coup, Mr Chaudhry was presented donations totalling $82,394.88 in functions held in his honour as Prime Minister in Canada and the United States during his visit to these countries in September 2000.

The moneys were donated to enable the FLP to pay for legal costs in relation to its High Court challenge on the abrogation of the 1997 Constitution following the Speight coup.

Similarly, we had donated in hundreds to the Cyclone Ami Funds, and therefore have the right to ask questions, and obtain answers from Mr Chaudhry since it was in his name that account number CA155728 was set up in the Bank of Baroda in Suva.

From Fijileaks archive, 22 February 2016

Rajendra Chaudhry
1 hr · Auckland, New Zealand · 2016


What an ass!

Good to see the regime's mouthpiece attacking me over my Facebook posts re TC Winston.
Says I am enemy number one of the State! Utters swears on social media whilst holding the law and order chair in Parliament.
Such words from a political driftwood doesn't faze me one bit. I have dealt with and knocked out totally many more credible political opponents than this ass.
Doesn't this idiot realise that the regime he serves under is itself illegal and has no moral or legal basis?
Assneel's posting shows that my and that of others are doing serious damage to the regime - which is now wobbly and struggling to survive. Having plundered the State's finances and borrowed to the hilt the regime will not be able to make any real impact on the repairs required.
Assneel appears to let his emotion rather than logic address my postings on TC Winston and that is that the calamity is the wrath of God on a nation that has become to a large extent ungodly.
Such wrath of God are nothing new and the Bible and other religious scriptures aver to it in their writings. Perhaps Assneel may wish to do some reading on this.
Further Assneel needs to be reminded that his leader is a murderer, a treasonist and a thief who will one day face and the gallows for the offence of treason.
These are facts and no amount of emotional bullshit by Assneel can change such statements of fact.
And next time you post something about someone Assneel then give that person the right to respond. Don't be a bloody coward like your leader!
And it is not I who will rot in hell but your leader and that day is fast approaching boy.

http://www.fijileaks.com/home/bank-accounts-fiji-regime-sets-up-bank-accounts-for-you-to-donate-for-winston-victims-but-let-us-hope-there-will-be-transparency-of-money

LEARNING CURVE OR INTIMIDATING TACTIC: Police Commissioner drops into "Soko Trial" claiming 'being in a court room was a new experience' - YES, for he has been on the run from the law since 2006! 

$
0
0

From Fijileaks Archives:

http://fijivillage.com/news/Violence-not-tolerated-in-Fiji---PM-25rk9s/

From Fijileaks Archive, 26 October 2015:

"[The student] was assaulted by headteacher [Sashi Kumar] today in school. Received 2 punches to scalp, then was hit with stick on back, and on left leg" - Sigatoka Hospital Medical Report, 13 October 2015; Fijileaks understands Kumar was also under investigation for alleged corruption

The Head Teacher of Naidovi Primary School in Sigatoka (Mr Sashi Kumar) is the principal assailant in the medical report. Kumar beat the Class 3 student in the school resulting in the student getting serious injuries on his leg and head. A police report and a medical report was done and the Education Ministry, surprisingly, has not SUSPENDED the head teacher from the school. To make it worse, they have settled the police case (which was lodged earlier) without considering the welfare of the Class 3 student, who not only has to face the Head Teacher KUMAR on a daily basis but is now paralyzed with FEAR  during school hours and also whenever he runs into the student beater SASHI KUMAR. The Police and Education Minister Reddy have been accused of protecting Kumar and forced the student's family to settle the police case

Picture
TWO FACED SCHOOL HEAD: Head teacher Sashi Kumar with the Ambassador of Japan to Fiji, Yutaka Yoshizawa, exchanging grant contracts in 2011

Fijileaks: Let us see if DDP Pryde will lodge an official complaint against Qiliho's unexpected entrance into the court where his 'men' are on trial

CANE GROWERS FACE BLEAK DIWALI, NFP claims: [Cane growers] have been shortchanged following announcement of the final payment for the 2015 season, which they will receive this Friday (28th October)

$
0
0
October 27, 2016
MEDIA RELEASE
 
Cane growers grossly shortchanged
 
The country’s cane growers will have a bleak Diwali because they have been shortchanged following the announcement of the final payment for the 2015 season, which they will receive this Friday (28th October).
 
The total payment for 2015 season cane is only $71.86 per tonne inclusive of the $1.38 per tonne top up to the final cane payment of 72 cents to make it $2.10 per tonne. And without this top up, the payment would have been $70.48.
 
Over 70% of cane growers numbering over 9,000 will have received $4,029 as net income for the 2015 season minus the average cost of production of $45 per tonne. . This is almost $1,400 less than $5428.80 earned annually by a worker on the meagre minimum wage of $2.32 per hour.
 
The Fiji First Government, Fiji Sugar Corporation and other stakeholders in the industry who are controlled by Government are hoodwinking growers by claiming the total payment is much higher and around $76.66, are including the special payment of $4.80 in their claim.
 
The NFP points out that the total payment includes two special payments totaling $4.80.  The first special payment of $2.80 was made on 9th November 2015 while the second special payment of $2 was made on 15th January 2016.
 
These special payments do not and should not form part of the total payout because cane growers have repaid $3.80 of the total amount of $4.80, with the remaining $1 to be deducted next year.
 
 This is confirmed by the Prime Minister and Minister for Sugar in a written answer to my parliamentary question (71/2016). Cane Growers have already paid this amount in two deductions of $1.40 from the 2nd payment in December 2015 and $2.40 from the 4th payment in May.
 
The total price is therefore $71.86 per tonne inclusive of the $1.38 top up to the final payment. This is $9.14 less than $81 per tonne growers received for the 2014 season. This raises the question of how effective the former CEO of FSC Abdul Khan was in terms of marketing our sugar because he was solely responsible for this important task that previously was an industry effort inclusive of growers as the most important stakeholders.
 
Last year, Government through the Fiji Sugar Corporation topped up the 4th cane payment by almost $8 per tonne and the Attorney General is quoted as saying ”this was because of tremendous performance of FSC under its present management especially Executive Chairman Abdul Khan”. The AG said last May Government was committed to the welfare and prosperity of individual farmers.
 
 
Where has the Government’s commitment to the welfare and prosperity gone in 2016? Where has the delivery by Fiji First Government of real outcomes for farmers and their families disappeared, as proclaimed by the AG last May?
 
Has it disappeared because growers are overwhelmingly and vehemently opposed to the Reform of the Sugarcane Industry and Sugar Cane Growers Fund Amendment Bills?
 
Growers expected the Government to naturally top up the payment to ensure the total price was over $80 per tonne, given a similar action last year.
 
More importantly, growers expect direct assistance from government after devastation to their crops caused by TC Winston.
 
At a time when growers need assistance the most, government is ignoring their plight and the fact they will have a bleak Diwali.
 
Any government should not ignore the plight of growers because to do so is inhumane. That is why we repeat our call for Government to implement our proposal of allocating $50 million every year for the next three years, which will not only guarantee a minimum price of $90 per tonne but also boost the industry.
 
Authorised by: -
 
Honourable Professor Biman Prasad
NFP Leader
 
 
 
 

DIWALI MESSAGES FROM FFP, FLP, SODELPA AND NFP all have similar ring: 'The triumph of knowledge over ignorance and good over evil'

$
0
0

Fijileaks: A Happy Diwali to ALL


Picture
Diwali is a great and beautiful festival: Ro Kepa

Opposition Leader Ro Teimumu Kepa says that Diwali is a great and beautiful festival that celebrates the victory of good over evil.

Ro Teimumu says that this is something which is embraced by people everywhere, whatever their origins, beliefs or religion and it is truly a universal theme.

In her Diwali message, Ro Teimumu says that in Fiji the Hindu light of Diwali co-exists harmoniously with the light of Christianity and the radiance they spread serves to unite in a special way for our diverse nation.

She says recently the people of her Vanua accepted the descendants of those survivors of the Syria which was carrying indentured labourers from India on May 11th, 1884.

Ro Teimumu adds that now after the passing of the years, her own people and today’s descendants of the Syria have unified in a unique way which is through solemn ceremonies both groups reached out to each other to become one.

She says that those who came to Rewa in that direct line from the Syria are now forever part of the vanua of Noco and the greater vanua of Rewa.

Ro Teimumu says they are Kai Noco and Kai Rewa.- Source: Fijivillage News


A time for reflection
 
It is extremely pleasing to see that Hindu members of our Indo-Fijian community, who have made Fiji their home have maintained and continued their cultural and religious activities in a vibrant manner through Ramayan Mandalis and construction of temples.
 
This is most admirable as you are bequeathing a strong foundation of self-dignity and the virtues of respect and tolerance to future generations.
 
Deepavali or Diwali is the Festival of Lights. It is a time of rejoicing with family and friends. It is also a time for prayer and reflection. It is a time to remember the unfortunate, the sick, infirm and elderly.
 
 
The lighting of the traditional lamp, Diya, symbolizes the triumph of light over darkness, knowledge over ignorance and most importantly, truth over evil.
 
The light from the Diya re-commits all of us to bring light to any place facing darkness. Hindus are very resilient and draw strength from their faith and a sense of solidarity in times of adversity. It is a time to remember the unfortunate, the sick, infirm and elderly
 
The return of Lord Rama after 14 years in exile is a triumphant occasion. Lord Rama is the embodiment of truth, justice, righteousness, honesty, integrity and humility.
 
The virtues of Lord Rama and the significance of Diwali are extremely relevant in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-cultural country like Fiji.
 
We have a newly constituted Parliament for over two years now, which is the highest court of the land. Parliament must make decisions in the national interest. Narrow and sectarian interests must be discarded.
 
The high cost of living, the decline of the sugar industry, the devastating effects of Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston that has resulted in many thousands being homeless for the last 8 months, Cyclone victims forced to eat wild food suitable for animals, deteriorating public health system with shortage of basic medicine, rising unemployment, rising national debt levels, derogations in the Bill of Rights of the 2013 Constitution, regressive and draconian decrees, a regulated media and the deteriorating health system and medical services are fundamental problems that can only be resolved by a display of sound and sensible leadership.
 
To ignore these fundamental problems would be doing so at our own peril. In Fiji, calling everyone Fijians and saying they enjoy common and equal citizenry doesn’t guarantee fundamental freedoms like freedom of speech, freedom of association and freedom of the media. It does not guarantee job opportunities based on meritocracy, rendering common and equal citizenry meaningless.
 
These are the challenges we face as a community and as a nation, which unfortunately are not highlighted by the media. This reality may not be grasped by many of you simply because limitations in the Constitution and continuation of regressive Decrees that dilute provisions in the Bill of Rights, resulting in the inability of the media to disseminate such information.
 
As a party born out of the struggle for dignity and justice of all our people, the NFP will continue the struggle for the triumph of truth over evil, light over darkness and knowledge over ignorance so that our beloved nation once again becomes a beacon of hope and trust.
 
We wish the people of Fiji a blessed Deepavali.

Hon Professor Biman Prasad
NFP Leader

National Federation Party to Frank Bainimarama: "WHO IS A RACIST?"

$
0
0
Picture
October 28, 2016
MEDIA RELEASE

Prime Minister and Fiji First Party Leader Voreqe Bainimarama is insulting the intelligence of the people of Fiji by labeling the National Federation Party as racist just because the Party champions the interests of the cane growers.
 

Speaking to FBC TV News on Wednesday night (26th October) the Prime Minister said his Fiji First Party would not form a coalition with another party for 2018 general elections because “their policies don’t align”.
 
He also stated that “that the National Federation Party now is not the same as the NFP of old” and furthermore said, “I would think that the NFP party now is a racist party that’s why they all in the cane fields because of the vote of the Indo-Fijians. Their policies are totally at the extreme nowadays.”
 
Nothing can be further from the truth. The Prime Minister, if he believes his warped logic must now answer the following: -

  1. Does he know that almost 30% of cane growers are Fijians of i-Taukei descent?
  2. Is he refusing to accept sound and sensible solutions proposed by the NFP to resuscitate the sugar industry and improve the livelihood of cane growers because he thinks upholding the interest of growers who comprise of 70% Indo-Fijians  and who are descendants of the Girmitiya is racism
  3. Does this mean that the Prime Minister who is the Minister for i-Taukei Affairs is a racist because the Ministry exclusively looks after the interests of our i-Taukei community?
  4. Does this also mean that the Prime Minister, who was Commander of Republic of Fiji Military Forces for 15 years, an organisation whose personnel are almost exclusively i-Taukei, is a racist?
  5. Does this mean that just because the elite arm of RFMF (CRW Unit) helped George Speight execute the coup in May 2000 to overthrow a Government led by an Indo-Fijian, make the Prime Minister racist because he was Commander of the Army?
  6. Does this mean that the abrogation of the 1997 Constitution and then Commander Bainimarama’s refusal to re-instate the Fiji Labour Party Leader as Prime Minister following the end to the hostage crisis in 2000 , actions later proven in Court of Appeal to be in defiance of the rule of law was an act of racism?
  7.  And does this mean that when as Commander, Bainimarama executed the coup to topple an i-Taukei led multi-party multiracial Government in December 2006, was yet again a racist act?

These are legitimate questions that the Prime Minister must now answer truthfully and he must do so by applying the same logic that he did in labeling NFP a racist party.
 
His political character and credibility now faces the litmus test.
 
Authorised by: -
 
Hon Professor Biman Prasad
NFP Leader

Picture
From The Fiji Sun archive, 2008:


Race politics road to “millionairehood” in Fiji

Chaudhry greatest beneficiary of political racism


By VICTOR LAL
Fiji Sun, 2008


The esteemed and learned academic, Professor Satendra Nandan, an old and dear “comrade” of mine in our long and relentless fight for the last two decade, against the cancer of racism and coups in the country, says Fiji is a racist state, and that some people have benefited a lot by transforming racial thinking into a political art. He forgot to add that racism could also be a silky road to richness in Fiji, especially for those Indo-Fijian leaders whom “Mother India” considers as one of her own.

The case in point is that of Mahendra Pal Chaudhry, who lost power in a racist coup but who became an overnight secret double-digit millionaire from the debris of racism. Who says racism does not pay in Fiji?

The Fiji Labour Party leader was able to acquire the $2million dollar status because “Mother India” continued to regard him as one of her own, and he allowed himself to be treated as her own, despite his family being rooted in Fiji since 1912. But, it must be pointed out, that in Mr Chaudhry’s case, he is also an exception; for a part of his family still live in Haryana, and he only recently visited his niece Madhu Chaudhry’s home, while leading a three-member delegation of the Fiji government to hold talks with Indian leaders including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

During the 2000 hostage crisis, it was Madhu Chaudhry who on behalf of the family, called on the then Hindu right-wing BJP Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee to send Indian commandos to Fiji to free Mr Chaudhry from the clutches of George Speight, and restore the ousted Peoples Coalition government. “These people are savages,” she said at the time. “These people should be killed”. No effort, it seems, had been made to educate her and other Indians that savagery and cannibalism was now a thing of the past in Fiji. 

The 2000 coup, with overt racist tone, had put Mr Chaudhry’s ancestral Haryana village in the international spotlight. And he was adopted as “The Son of Haryana”. In August 2000, Mr Chaudhry arrived in New Delhi on a 10-day visit at the invitation of Prime Minister Vajpayee. He had gone to India to drum up support for the restoration of democracy and human rights in Fiji. His cause was greatly helped by the BJP government and its political allay in Haryana, Om Prakash Chautala.

In May 2000, when Mr Chaudhry was held hostage, Mr Chautala had written to Mr Vajpayee and the then UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, seeking their intervention for the restoration of democracy in Fiji and for the safety of Mr Chaudhry. In his letter to Mr Vajpayee, Mr Chautala had expressed his grave concern over the manner in which the Indo-Fijian community had been sidelined Fiji. He had impressed upon Mr Vajpayee to safeguard the interests of the Indo-Fijians as otherwise, it might send a wrong signal for the safety of Indians settled in other countries. As Mr Chaudhry hailed from Haryana, the people were particularly concerned about his safety, and he wanted Mr Vajpayee to convey the Haryana state and its peoples’ sentiments about Mr Chaudhry’s safety to Mr Anan.

Mr Chaudhry, according to Indian news reports, was given a hero’s welcome at Rothak in Haryana, where welcome arches and flag-waving school children greeted Mr Chaudhry. He was feted at a public reception by Mr Chautala’s Haryana state government. His struggle in Fiji was likened to the then South African President Nelson Mandela’s crusade against apartheid in old racist South Africa.

In his speech, according to Indian newspaper reports, Mr Chaudhry told a cross-section of politicians and a gathering of up to 8,000 people who had turned up to cheer him, that his struggle to restore democracy in Fiji would be fraught with danger because the guns were still in the hands of rebels who had overthrown his Peoples Coalition Government. “I have not received such a reception at home,” Mr Chaudhry told the crowd. “For a moment it appeared as if I was in my own political constituency.”

On 28 August 2000, two days after Mr Chaudhry’s planned departure from India, Mr Chautala announced the formation of an Indo-Fijian Friendship Society, to be constituted under the patronage of Mr Chaudhry. Mr Chautala said the society would make efforts to restore democracy in Fiji. He asked all Haryana residents to donate one Indian rupee each as a token of respect for Mr Chaudhry, whose ancestors hailed from Rohtak district in the Haryana state. Mr Chautala had fixed a target of Rs.16 million for the Indo-Fijian Fund, which is equal to the state’s population. He said the money would be collected by elected representatives of “panchayat” (village councils) and municipal committees and would be deposited in the society's bank account.
 
To cut the story short, Mr Chaudhry claimed in Parliament on 2 December 2005 that he never received a cent from Mr Chautala, but neither did he disclose that he had secretly received $2million from one Harbhajan Lal, a part of the money transferred through the Indian Consulate-General in Sydney? In Parliament, Mr Chaudhry claimed to have discovered only during his 2005 visit to India that Mr Chautala’s record with money was not transparent. “My anger about the whole episode is that Shri Chautala should exploit the feelings of the ordinary and poor folks of Haryana who are emotionally tied to me and to the people of Indian origin in Fiji and play on them a game of deceit for self enrichment,” Mr Chaudhry said. What link did Mr Chaudhry employ to get the $2million?

It was sixty years ago when, in 1948, the first Prime Minister of independent India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, raised the issue of citizenship, including that of Indo-Fijians, in the Indian parliament. He had repeatedly stressed that “integration” was the key to the survival of “Overseas Indians” in the foreign lands. He told them bluntly to identify themselves with the colonies in which they had settled.

On 8 March 1948, Mr Nehru told the Indian Parliament: “Now these Indians abroad…Are they Indian citizens…or not? If not, then our interest in them becomes cultural and humanitarian, not political. Take the Indians of Fiji or Mauritius: are they going to retain their nationality, or will they become Fiji nationals or Mauritians? The same question arises in regard to Burma and Ceylon. This House wants to treat them as Indians, and with the same breath it wants a complete franchise for them in the countries where they are living. Of course, the two things do not go together. Either they get the franchise as nationals of the other country, or treat them as Indians minus the franchise and ask for them the most favourable treatment given to an alien.”

One of the basic barriers to successful race relations in Fiji has been the wrong signal successive Indian governments’ and its high commissioners to Fiji (the exception being Bhagwan Singh) have conveyed to the Indo-Fijians and their leaders that India will stand or fall with them because they are India’s “overseas children”.
 Of course, there is nothing wrong in having divided loyalties but as I have consistently maintained, India must be only allowed to involve herself culturally and religiously with the Indo-Fijians, and not politically (some would even argue, economically). The official Indian position has always been “Its Fiji’s internal matter”, but privately, historically, and from personal experience, it has always been a secretive meddlesome country in the affairs of Fiji. Whenever an Indo-Fijian sneezes from the South Pacific chill, Mother India catches fever.

Professor Nandan, who was a victim of the 1987 coups, has described the 2006 coup as a necessary evil and one that is lesser of the two evils. This coup, he reckoned, is the coup that will wipe off all coups. He claimed that although the coup maybe illegal or unconstitutional, it is ethical and moral. We should not be surprised by his comments, for after all, he has described the Qarase government, comprising of SDL-FLP Cabinet ministers, as “racial terrorism”.

It seems there is a twisted logic rife among certain sections of the Indo-Fijian community and their leaders, and it is as follows: the 1987 coups ushered in untold suffering and racism against the Indo-Fijian community, so if they are to correct or prevent further racism against the community, another coup is a “necessary evil”. In other words, only an anti-taukei Fijian coup is the only guarantor of their survival in Fiji.

I thought the great inspirational Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi is on record as saying that “an eye for an eye, makes the world go blind”.

But, maybe, certain sections of the Indo-Fijian community and their leaders have now contracted the coup culture virus, and are totally blind and immune to the havoc the coup is inflicting on the nation and to race relations in the country.

On the other hand, surely, some would be tempted to become double-digit millionaires from the cancer of racism, especially when “Mother India” might be willing to stuff $2million in their pockets, because she refuses to treat the Indo-Fijians as Nehru’s “foreign aliens” in Fiji.

And some Indo-Fijian leaders want to continue to cling to the “saree” of “Mother India”, despite their ancestors having permanently left behind their “dhotis” in their ancestral homeland when they signed up as indentured labourers for Fiji, beginning in 1879.
 
As for those holding onto power through the barrel of the gun, it is worth reminding them of Professor Nandan’s own message to them, although he was writing against the 1987 coups, in his Requiem for a Rainbow: A Fijian Indian Story: “The only hope is that they who sit on the bayonets cannot be comfortable for too long. “The curse, the curse”, Kurtz could have cried.”

In another book, Fiji: Paradise in Pieces, Professor Nandan wrote of Mr Chaudhry during his (Mr Chaudhry’s) incarceration at the hands of George Speight: “Because Chaudhry is an extraordinary organiser and campaigner, almost in the Gandhian tradition, the greatest asset he knows are a country’s people. As soon as he’s out of the clutches of the brutal, gun-toting clowns, he’ll be rebuilding his political base with a steely passion and renewed hope.”

Professor Nandan could not have forecast that Mr Chaudhry would be also $2million richer from the actions of the same “brutal, gun-toting clowns” holding Mr Chaudhry in the name of their taukei Fijian race. Racism, certainly, could be an economic windfall for some Indo-Fijian leaders.

It is time the Indian government, the Indian High Commission here, and the Indo-Fijian leaders, took heed of Mr Nehru’s advice: the Indo-Fijians must choose to be Indians in Fiji or Fiji Indians.

The Indo-Fijian leaders and their followers, including India, cannot have it both ways. 
 
What Mr Nehru said in 1948 is still relevant, sixty years later, in 2008.
 
The views expressed are those of Victor Lal and not that of the Fiji Sun. E-mail: victor_lal@yahoo.co.uk. Fijileaks: Victor Lal stopped using this e-mail account after it was hacked in 2008 following his revelation that Mahendra Chaudhry had $2million in his Australian bank account.


Fijileaks: The $2million was for George Speight's "Girmitya VICTIMS" who were hiding in the Girmit Centre following the 2000 failed coup:

WORLD BANK DUMBS DOWN FIJI after Aiyaz Khaiyum had unilaterally shut down Data Bureau Ltd; Bank gives his plan 0/8 and Fiji 79 places!

SHAMELESS MALE CHAUVINISTS: Just look at the list, only one White WOMAN, and one INDO-FIJIAN woman on the Committee organizing an international conference on End of Indentureship to be held in Lautoka

$
0
0
Conference Committee
 
Professor Subramani, Fiji National University, Lautoka, Fiji.
Professor Vijay Naidu, University of the South Pacific, Fiji
Professor Ajay Kumar Dubey, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India.
Professor Biman Prasad, Director, Fiji Institute of Applied Studies, and Parliament of Fiji, Fiji
Professor Dharmendra Sharma, University of Canberra, Australia
Professor Narendra Reddy, Head of MBA Programme, University of Fiji, Fiji
Professor Ram Karan, Dean, College of Business, Fiji National University, Nasinu, Fiji.
Professor Satendra Nandan, (Emeritus), University of Canberra, Australia
Professor Satish Chand, School of Business, UNSW Canberra, Australia
Professor Steven Ratuva, Director, Centre for Pacific Studies, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Professor Vinay Lal, Department of History, UCLA., USA
Dr. Ajaya K. Sahoo, Director, Centre for the Study of Indian Diaspora, University of Hyderabad, India
Dr. Jacqui Leckie, Otago University, New Zealand
Dr. Mohit Prasad, University of the South Pacific, Fiji.
Dr. Narayan R. Raju, Director, Pathology Research Laboratory, Inc, South San Francisco., USA
Dr. Neelesh Goundar, University of the South Pacific, Fiji.
Dr. Rajni Chand, University of the South Pacific, Fiji
Dr. Shailendra Singh, University of the South Pacific, Fiji
Mr. John Sami, Auckland, New Zealand
Mr. Nadesa Goundar, Unitec, Auckland, New Zealand
 
Conference Chairman / Chief Convener: Dr. Sunil Kumar, Univ. of the South Pacific.
Conference Vice Chair/Deputy Convener: Dr. Rajni Chand, Univ. of the South Pacific
Conference Organising Secretary: Dr. Ganesh Chand.
Chairman, CCAII Convention Organising Committee: Mr. Jagannath Sami, Fiji Girmit Council.
 
Conference Contact Details:
Chairman/Chief Convener:  sunil.s.kumar@usp.ac.fj ; mobile: (679) 9948097
Deputy Chairrajni.chand@usp.ac.fj ; mobile: (679) 9485468
Organising Secretary:  conference.ccaii@gmail.com ; mobile: (679) 9955709
Office: Girmit Centre, Queens Road, Lautoka
Phone: 679-6660544, (Mob) 679-9998594
Websitehttp://fijianstudies.openmediafiji.com/others/fiji-girmit/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/FijiGirmit2017/?fref=ts

Fijileaks: One obvious Indo-Fijian woman who could have been inducted onto the Committee is Dr Shaista Shameem. She did her PhD on the way men ignored the women in Indenture. Her thesis was titled: 'Sugar and Spice: Wealth Accumulation and the Labour of Indian Women in Fiji: 1879-1930'

 South Asians Overseas: Migration and Ethnicity, originally published in 1990, is an indispensable resource for scholars interested in the diaspora, or concerned with problems of migration; re-published by Cambridge University Press in paperback, February 2010; Victor Lal had contributed a chapter on Indo-Fijians in Fiji
Picture
Objective: The primary objective of the conference is to facilitate discourse on all aspects related to Girmit, in Girmitiya countries and in others where Girmitiya descendants have migrated. Any and every aspect of Girmit and its descendants from 1834 onwards is covered.
 
Main Theme: Indian Indentureship and Girmitiya Descendants: Past, Present and Future

Suggested Topics for Papers:
  • Girmit-Indigenous Polity
  • Indenture and Economy
  • Historical Grounding
  • Girmit & Business
  • Gender & Development
  • Violence of Indenture
  • Art, Drama, Film, Music: Girmit in Consciousness
  • Writers Forum: Language of Girmit
  • Education & Development
  • Science & Technology
  • Health & Medicine
  • Twice/Thrice Banished
  •  Engaging with the Girmit Diaspora
  • Girmit, India, and the Contemporary World
  • Future: the next 100 years

Language: English (Hindi, Tamil, Telegu, Malayalam, French, Fijian languages acceptable for Writers Forum). Those who need translation services should advise the Secretariat by 31 Dec 2016.
 
Who Should Attend?: All researchers, writers and activists whose interest is in Girmit.
 
Important Dates: The following are the critical dates:
1. Submission of Abstract: 31 December 2016
2. Notification of acceptance: 15 January 2017
3. Full paper submission: 28 February 2017
4. Early Registration: 28 February 2017
5. Late Registration: 22 March 2017
6. Daily Registration: 22-24 March 2017
 
Social Events
Conference Dinner: 22 March 2017
Networking Dinner: 23 March 2017
Closing Dinner: 24 March 2017
Excursions: 25 March 2017 / 26 March 2017
 
Registration Fee (to be confirmed):
Girmitiya Country Residents/India Residents: $F50 (USD25)
Other Residents: $F100 (USD50)
Students, Unemployed, Retired: no charge
Observers: $F50
Day Rates: $F20 (excludes dinners)
All participants must register.
* Full Registration Fee covers conference materials, session fees, and all teas and dinners. Separate charges for excursions would be levied. Details to be announced soon.

Picture
The late Indian Prime Minister Mrs.Gandhi meeting the surviving Girmityas during a visit to the Fiji Girmit Centre

FLP: 'For those who care to remember, as Prime Minister [and] as Army Commander, [Bainimarama] has a record of torture and abuses linked to him personally. Under his charge mutiny soldiers were tortured in 2000' 

$
0
0
Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama must have a very short memory span if he can stand up in a public forum and claim that he does not condone human rights abuses of any kind.

This is what he told those attending a regional workshop on the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Sigatoka on Thursday.

For those who care to remember, as Prime Minister as well as Army Commander, he has a record of torture and abuses linked to him personally.

But then such hypocrisy and sanctimonious pronouncements in public are characteristic of Mr Bainimarama and his Qorvis-prepared speeches.

Under his charge as Army Commander CRW soldiers were brutally tortured following the mutiny at Queen Elizabeth Barracks in November 2000. It was under his command as well that rebels of the Speight group in Labasa were brutalised once they were rounded up in July/August 2000.

Following the 2006 coup, there have been numerous reports of atrocities and brutalities committed by the RFMF on dissidents who opposed the Army takeover:

Detainees, even old people, being forced to run around the camp naked; former RFMF chief of Staff Ratu Tevita Mara himself has claimed that the Commander clad in a balaclava assaulted women activists in the military camp at night, including pregnant women; some deaths have also been attributed to Army brutality around this time.

Under the Public Emergency Regulations (PER) of 2009, trade unionists were assaulted by soldiers and both Sugar and General Workers general secretary Felix Anthony and NFU official Gaffar Ahmed claimed afterwards they were beaten up on the orders of the Prime Minister. Innocent cane farmers were also detained and made to run around the Army camp, on false accusations of burning their cane.

Reports on human rights abuses by Fiji have been filed by Amnesty International, the US State Department as well as the United Nations Human Rights Council. The most shocking of these was the torture inflicted by members of the security forces on five escaped prisoners in 2012, videos of which went viral in early 2013.
Mr. Bainimarama’s personal security officer was later charged for the brutal assault on escaped prisoner Iowane Benedito. Bainimarama is on record saying: “At the end of the day, I will stick by my men, by the police officers or anyone else that might be named in this investigation.”

If Mr Bainimarama is sincere about bringing the perpetrators of such abuses to justice, then he should be the first person to face the brunt of the law. So should senior Army officers under whose instructions much of these atrocities were committed.

He proudly claims that “ we do not have and never had a State-sanctioned policy of inflicting cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment in Fiji”.

How does he explain the overnight detention of his political opponents who were recently questioned and kept in police cells overnight accused of attending a meeting on the Constitution held without a permit. Subsequently, the DPP declined to lay charges against them.

How does he explain the torture of an internet café owner in Lautoka by the security forces? Why is it that to date no-one has been arrested or questioned about the assault on this individual – in a recent incident, he was brutally beaten up and left to die.

Several members of the Media have also been detained and assaulted. One of the reasons behind the curtailment of media rights post 2009 was to stop the media from publicising such cases of human rights abuses.

The Fiji army has a long history of violence and human right abuses going back to the 1987 coups.

Mr Bainimarama and his security forces have a lot to answer for in regards to cruel, degrading or inhumane treatment meted out to his opponents and dissidents, and even some innocent people.

2 November 2016: Bainimarama and his troops remember their fallen

The Republic of Fiji Military Forces this morning [2 November 2016] held a memorial service for those soldiers who died in the attempted mutiny of November 2nd, 2000.

They were private Temo Veilewai, Private Osea Rokosirinavosa and Private Simione Rawaileba.

The service was attended by Prime Minister Hon. Voreqe Bainimarama and Deputy Military Commander Mohammed ​Aziz and Fiji Navy ​Commander John Fox.

This year marked the 16th year for the commemoration.

The memorial service was held at the Queen Elizabeth Barracks.

HACKING UPDATE: 'Remove all your post against Parveen Bala and Laukesh [Lal] or else... we will F***K you off.  It's a warning boci. Remember my hands aren't far off from ******* panty -  FFP HACKERS

$
0
0

* Fijileaks: In response to inquiries we would like to inform all and sundry that the investigations are still on-going but the above threat was from the FFP HACKERS who wanted a WinZip File containing various correspondence between FFP Minister Parveen Bala, Attorney-General's Office, Prime Minister's Office, DPP's Office, Indo-Fijian businessmen and some Government Ministers to be DESTROYED otherwise the hackers would "RAPE Victor Lal's daughter" - WHY?
THE FILE CONTAINS DOCUMENTS THAT SUGGEST THE SRI LANKAN MAGISTRATE MIGHT HAVE BEEN ALLEGEDLY BRIBED $50,000 TO ACQUIT PARVEEN BALA FOR CAUSING DEATH BY DANGEROUS DRIVING

*FFP Hackers gloating with each other shortly after hacking into Victor Lal's computer to prevent him from releasing the 'Bala Documents'. That is one of many reasons why FIJI POLICE keep lying that Victor Lal has made no complaint to them.

* An Indo-Fijian businessman paid $5,000 to the wife of the late Puna Chand after the accident on behalf of Parveen Bala

*One Indo-Fijian businessman Laukesh Lal (who turns out to be related to Victor Lal but is reportedly very close to FFP Minister Parveen Bala) is vehemently denying that it was he who had sent a photo of his penis to Victor Lal's daughter to intimidate her and to bully Victor Lal into
shutting down Fijileaks. Fiji's Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum is privy to every correspondence from the FijiFirst Party hackers, including their identities, but has so far not acted against them. His brother and FBC CEO, Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum, has also been implicated in the hacking! A few took the law into their own hands, based on e-mails to Aiyaz Khaiyum (did he pass it to them?), to threaten Victor Lal's contacts following the hacking.

HE even met up with ASHNEEL SUDHAKAR, the FFP Government Whip and chairman of Human Rights and Justice Committee, to plan the arrest of one of Victor Lal's contacts:

WHO circulated Victor LAL's HACKED e-mails?

We will reveal the names of the hackers once full investigation is complete, including the identity of one MIKTEST12121212
who wrote most of the words to the postings against Victor Lal, his children, and others in Lal's e-mail contact list:

Picture
FFP Hackers doctor photo to accuse Victor Lal of being a pedophile

We have already pointed out that the child in the photo is none other than Victor Lal's son. The photo was doctored by Aiyaz Khaiyum's FFP hackers after they hacked into Victor Lal's daughter's computer. The original photo was taken in Spain in 2011 where the family have a holiday home. The children were enjoying a day out in one of Spain's largest outdoor aqua pools

Picture
A police search reveal that the FFP hackers had stolen this photo, doctored it by cutting out Victor Lal's daughter from the original photo, blacked out his son's face and swimming trunk (see left photo) to accuse Victor Lal of being a pedophile. We have blurred his childrens faces in the original photo from 2011.

We will also reveal the identity of m*********1@gmail.com who had hacked and changed editor@fijileaks.com e-mail account to gain control  of Fijileaks website, resulting in Victor Lal not being able to gain access to his Fijileaks e-mail account for two weeks.
M*********1has been decoded and revealed as miktest1111@gmail.com
We will reveal the identity of MIKTEST1111

MIKTEST1111 went on to selectively delete scores of e-mails between and relating to FFP Minister Mahendra Reddy, Ashneel Sudhakar, self-confessed hacker still-at-large Kishore Kumar and MIDA and Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination chairman Ashwin Raj. The hackers also doctored another 2011 family photo from Spain; comparing Victor Lal's "manhood" with that of Ashwin Raj in one of their postings!

ISA! Will President Konrote be arrested on his return to Fiji (or sacked) for meeting with the so-called "Anti-Government Terrorist" VICTOR LAL?

Picture
President Jioji Konrote and Victor Lal in London last month

From Fijileaks Archive - Re "BalaGate Trial"

Fijileaks: Did Arun Wati's alleged lack of confidence result in her giving 'inconsistent evidence'? Or was it because it took DPP nearly three long years to bring Bala to court? 

Magistrate: 'None of the witnesses saw Bala behind the wheel of the car'

Fijileaks:
It is quite likely that witnesses did not see Bala driving the car. That does not mean that the case should collapse on that basis. The magistrate ruled that none of the witnesses saw Bala behind the wheel of his car. Hello, Bala did confess to a Police Officer at the scene that he (Bala) was the driver of the car

Magistrate claims the car did not suffer great damage. If so, why did Bala admit himself to the Lautoka Hospital after the accident?

WHO KILLED PUNA CHAND?

editor@fijileaks.com
vloxford@gmail.com

PASSING THE BUCK: 'It's not me but DR GANESH CHAND, former FNU Vice-Chancellor, who is organising the major conference in 2017 on end of indentureship; he is key convener and also on organizing committee'

$
0
0

Fijileaks: One of those listed as a key organiser now claims the paucity of women (especially Indo-Fijian women) on the Committee has nothing to do with him. We should contact Dr Chand, who is facing Abuse of Office charges before the Fiji High Court. "That is a bit risky - what if he goes in - than what happens to the conference?", Fijileaks to Committee member

* The only Indo-Fijian woman on the Committee is Dr Rajni Chand, the wife of NFP leader Biman Prasad. It is extra-ordinary that the Committee have not invited three most senior Indo-Fijian academics who have written on the Girmit era: Professor Brij Lal (written volumes and volumes); Dr Padma Narsey Lal (on the sugar industry), and Professor Wadan Narsey who published, in 1979, in the premier USP Journal of Pacific Studies, one of the first analyses of exploitation of indentured labourers by CSR. 

* This was for the special edition of the journal to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the arrival of Indian indentured labourers to Fiji. This long article can be read here in pdf:
https://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/monopoly-capital-white-racism-and-super%E2%80%91profits-in-fiji-a-case-study-of-the-colonial-sugar-refining-company-journal-of-pacific-studies%C2%AD-vol-5-1979-pp-66%E2%80%911/

LIFT SUSPENSION OF MPS: Inter-Parliamentary Union calls on the lifting of suspension for NFP president Tupou Draunidalo and Opposition Whip Ratu Isoa Tikoca. IPU: 'The suspensions are wholly disproportionate..."

$
0
0

IPU: "The freedom of expression is absolutely essential to the parliamentary mandate and that the exercise of this right includes not only statements that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive,
but also those that may offend, shock or disturb others; in this regard that Mr. Tikoca’s words, although touching on sensitive societal matters, fall within his right to freedom of expression; considers also that any concern about his words would have been best settled directly and immediately in the plenary of parliament, as seemed to have happened at first; in light of the above, the best way forward is for parliament to swiftly lift Mr. Tikoca’s suspension; and calls on parliament to take the necessary action..."

See pp 31-40
http://www.ipu.org/pdf/hrres199-en.pdf

THE NATIVE FIJIANS ARE LAZY AND DUMB! Now, Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Aiyaz Khaiyum's LITTLE brother and the FBC CEO Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum brands all of us IDIOTS - For standing up to HIM

$
0
0

THIS MAN, LIKE HIS BROTHER, HAS WRAPPED HIMSELF WITH 'SCARF' OF DICTATORSHIP AND BELIEVES THAT HE IS 'UNTOUCHABLE' FROM THE LONG ARM OF HIS BROTHER'S LAW, POLICE & JUDICIARY. Fijileaks has filed an official complaint with Police against him re-hacking

Picture
Riyaz: "YOU BLOODY IDIOTS"
Hahaha, Hehehehe, Hahaha!
Concerned citizens today lodged a complaint against FBC TV CEO and Wasea Bhasha - FBC TV Executive Producer, Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum for calling people who had raised issues against FBC "idiots".

#FijiMediaEthics #Fijipol

AND another Fijileaks hacking suspect ASHWIN RAJ, the MIDA chairman and director of Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discirmination Commission, is still fumbling on what to say against Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum. RAJ was very quick to come out and condemn Ratu Timoci Vesikula and Fiji TV - re "Water and Kerosene" comment; Raj swiftly branded it as
HATE SPEECH:

Lest we forget, NFP president Tupou Draunidalo, on the instigation of Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum, has been kicked out of Parliament for calling FFP Education Minister Mahendra Reddy an "IDIOT" despite she apologizing for her remarks

From Fijileaks archive:

"The comments by Hon. Draunidalo has led to a flurry of social media responses that bring the Parliament into serious disrepute. It is not the example we want to set as standard or acceptable pattern of behaviour for Members of Parliament and equally for the Fijian population because it will undermine the very institution which the Constitution and which we all need to protect to ensure that there is sustained parliamentary democracy and respect for this very critical branch of the State. It is also critical that our children and younger population are not exposed to this type of racial slurs as the norm or see that this Parliament is condoning such behaviour by an Honourable Member of Parliament." - FFP dominated Privileges Committee on Draunidalo

Aiyaz Khaiyum had claimed that he had not heard Draunidalo call Reddy "an idiot" until Vijay Narayan alerted him but he should hear his little brother and FBC CEO Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum call all of us IDIOTS:

"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA: I rather not comment about Idiots'

Ashwin Raj to Victor Lal (27/3/2014): "Thank you and my apologies if I came out a little abrasive this morning. The current public discourse saturated with hate speech, racial vilification, and personal attacks. These blog sites are important democratic spaces that can nuture deliberative democracy and I certainly hope that Fiji Leaks upholds these values at all times."
Fijileaks:
This is one of scores of e-mails from and between Ashwin Raj and Victor Lal that the hackers had wiped out from editor@fijileaks.com account. We had tried to hold him to account in other e-mails, which the hackers later used to launch the most sustained and vile verbal abuse against those who had ventured to privately comment on some of his double-standards as MIDA chairman. The hackers also wiped out documents relating to Raj which the police had leaked to Fijileaks when he was taken into custody at the Samabula Police Station. We are still restoring the hacked documents. Meanwhile, overseas police investigations are continuing, while Fiji Police are hiding from Fijileaks.

Viewing all 3541 articles
Browse latest View live